Note - the number of records in these data is 826, while the article reports 825. One serum sample (new_id 309) was mistakenly excluded from the shipment to University of Navarra, and was therefore excluded from both the denominator and numerator in the manuscript. However, it was included in the logistic regression analysis, and is therefore included in this data set for completeness and reproducibility.

Data dictionary:

(see also de Glanville et al 2017 for details)

new_ID: generated unique ID. 
age_c: Reported age in years
sex_c: Gender of participant
diagnosis_c: Knowing someone with a brucellosis diagnosis
milkdanger_c: High risk milk consumption
maladanger_c: High risk yoghurt consumption
meatdanger_c: High risk meat consumption
blood_c: High risk blood consumption
placenta_c: Contact with blood products
abortion_c: Contact with abortion materials
slaughter_c: Involvement with animal slaughter
RBT_h: Rose Bengal test result performed in health facilities
BAT: Febrile antigen Brucella agglutination test (FBAT) result, performed in health facilities
BAT_160: FBAT result with titres of 1:160 or greater
BAT_360: FBAT result with titres of 1:160 or greater
LFA: Rapid IgM/IgG lateral flow immunochromatography assay (LFA)
RBT_n: Rose Bengal test result performed at University of Navarra
Coombs_n: Coombs result
SAT_n: Serum agglutination test result
rbt_all: RBT_h and RBT_n combined